Proposal


Senior Project Proposal
Fight for Feathers: Supporting Both Arizona’s Indigenous People and Indigenous Wildlife
Chloe Gilmour
December 8, 2012


  1. Title of Project:
Fight for Feathers: Supporting Both Arizona’s Indigenous People and Indigenous Wildlife

  1. Statement of Purpose:
What do feathers mean to Arizona’s Native American tribes and do they even still carry a profound significance today? How do rehabilitation centers balance the needs of the Native American religious rites and the welfare of the native hawk and eagle species? How can this strained relationship work more efficiently and more amicably? I hope to greater understand the history of religious feathers in Native American culture and their importance. Additionally, I hope to study the treatment of protected wildlife and Native American rights in similar conflicting interests in other states in order to find the best compromise for both parties.    

  1. Background:
I began volunteering at Liberty Wildlife Rehabilitation Foundation as an orphan care volunteer during the summer of 2011. I tended to orphan song birds needs, performed simple health checks and necessary wildlife paperwork. In the fall of 2012, I took a ten week night course to become a part of the medical staff at Liberty Wildlife. Now, I treat all incoming wildlife including mammals, water fowl, raptors and eagles.

I soon became exposed to the feather repository program, learning that Liberty Wildlife manages one of only two repositories in the United States. A pioneer solution in the brewing conflict between religious and conservation laws, Liberty Wildlife provides one of the only legal ways for Native Americans to obtain the feathers and bird parts they desire for religious ceremonies and rites.

Interested in this unique program, I began to look for some more information regarding the feelings of Native Americans participating and a quote from one struck me.
“How would a non-indian feel if they had to get their Bible from a repository?” asked Northern Arapaho leader Nelson P. White. Clearly, many Native Americans do not fully support the repository and more research is still necessary to better understand this complex relationship.

  1. Prior Research:
The body of knowledge written on this topic is separated into three main categories. First, many books have been written on the conservation effort and the need for a protected status of a variety of Arizonan Native birds. At one point there were only 417 breeding pairs of Bald Eagles that have the most sought after ceremonial feathers left in the wild, so deaths due to tribal rites of passage would make a tremendous impact (Iraola) Additionally, much has been written on the spiritual meaning behind the feathers themselves and how theses feathers are so sacred that they must not fall to the ground much like the American flag (Stewart). Finally, many articles and opinion pieces discuss the controversial court cases surrounding feather rights in recent times. For example, many articles have been written on the recent license given to the Northern Arapaho Tribe to kill two protected Bald Eagles in Wyoming for religious purposes (Fiegel).  

  1. Significance:
The two largest Native American reservations in the United States are located in Arizona. That is over a quarter of the state’s area. If a quarter of our States people feel that their first amendment rights are being trampled, further research should be encouraged. New knowledge in this field will help to smooth the strained relationship between Arizona’s Native American community and rehabilitation centers like Liberty Wildlife and maybe even find solutions. My senior project uniquely conveys firsthand accounts and observations from those directly involved; something that nothing written on this topic has done. If I successfully find a possible solution to ease the tension between the two groups, I will not only let the members of the feather repository know but also voice the opinions I hear to the state department.

  1. Description:
I hope to research my project in a three pronged approach. First and foremost, I plan observe the process from feather request to feather delivery. This will be done by interning at Liberty Wildlife. Additionally, I would like to interview the conservationists at Liberty Wildlife and the Arizonan Native Americans who participate in the program. Finally, the bulk of my research will be library and internet based. I will have the opportunity to go to The British Library in London which is a major research library, holding over 150 million books, manuscripts, journals, newspapers, and more. Through research, I hope to greater understand all solutions offered in different states and produce a short film of my results.

  1. Methodology:
During the first phase of my project for the first five week, I will be studying the feather repository system by interning twelve hours a week at Liberty Wildlife. Here at Liberty, I hope to use observation and outside research to answer the first question that I posed: What do feathers mean to Arizona’s Native American tribes and do they even still carry a profound significance today? Also, I will gain insight to how the program deals with Native American feather requests. My second phase lasts three weeks and this will be composed of personal research, planning for my third phase. I will then use libraries and the internet to fully understand the problems at hand. In my five week third phase, I will interview those that run the feather repository program and gain contacts to interview those that use the program. During this phase, I will attempt to answer the rest of the questions and edit a video of my conclusion.

  1. Problems:
The main problem that I foresee is conducting interviews with Native Americans participating in the program. I do not know as of yet how willing participants are in answering my questions and sharing their beliefs. If I cannot interview anyone on Arizona’s reservations personally, I will rely on existing recorded interviews.

  1. Bibliography:

Brown, Brian Edward. "Religion, Law, and the Land: Native Americans and the Judicial Interpretations of Sacred Land." Greenwood Press, 1999.

Carpenter, Kristen A., Individual Religious Freedoms in American Indian Tribal Constitutional Law, "The Indian Civil Rights Act at Forty." UCLA American Indian Studies Publications, 2012.

Fiegel, Eric. “Feds grant Native American tribe permit to kill bald eagles for religious purposes”CNN. March 15th, 2012.


Neusner, Jacob, ed. World Religions in America: An Introduction. Westminster John Knox Press: Louisville, 2003.

Stewart, Omer C. Peyote Religion: A History. University of Oklahoma Press: Norman and London, 1987.

Iraola, Roberto. "The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act". Albany Law Review 68: 973–996. 2005.

Perkins, Matthew. "The Federal Indian Trust Doctrine and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act: Could Application of the Doctrine Alter the Outcome in U.S. v. Hugs".2000.

Neary, Ben. “Tribe: Bald Eagle Permit a Victory for Tradition” The Associated Press. March 21, 2012.

 

McShane, Larry.” Northern Arapaho Indian Tribe gets right to kill bald eagles” NY Daily News. March 14, 2012.


Mayntz, Melissa. “The Importance of Bird Conservation” about.com. December 10, 2012.

No comments:

Post a Comment